This situation was not expected by Tim Berners-Lee back then. 2. The real world is limited: I don’t want to be confined by physical conditions anymore Multiple voices should exist, but when the content presentation of digital platforms is linked to the structure of advertisements, people with different ideas have become antagonistic camps under the algorithm system. So, to solve this problem, is it necessary to eliminate the virtual world created by the Internet and return to reality? The answer is absolutely not.
After all, the power of "connectivity" brought about by Internet communication still outweighs the negative. The late and well-known philosopher industry email list Michel Serres, who is almost unknown to everyone in France, wrote in 2017, How Good It Was! ( C'était mieux avant!) refutes the arguments against the Internet age. The old philosopher, who was 86 years old at the time, told us through his experience in the difficult times of World War II and communication: In the past, human beings lived in a space that was incoherent and fragmented everywhere, living in isolation from each other, facing difficulties alone.
Trapped in reality; until the advent of the Internet and the advent of mobile phones, "the miracles brought by it are beyond imagination. No matter what the interval and distance, a sigh and a hint of disclosure will transcend the space like a beam of light. The touching encounter, I feel blended." Of course, Jon Radoff does not agree that the Metaverse is equal to a utopian ideal world, but if we want to reduce the fragmentation of today's digital masses and retain the advantages of "moving meeting, feeling fusion" that Michel Sailor refers to, he believes that Metaverse's "instant" ( The two characteristics of live) and "multi" (multi) are expected to create a virtual universe that is parallel to the real world but belongs to all kinds of people.